Starship | SN10 | High-Altitude Flight Test

  visualizzazioni 8,422,572

SpaceX

Mese fa

On Wednesday, March 3, Starship serial number (SN10) successfully completed SpaceX’s third high-altitude flight test of a Starship prototype from our site in Cameron County, Texas.
Similar to the high-altitude flight tests of Starship SN8 and SN9, SN10 was powered through ascent by three Raptor engines, each shutting down in sequence prior to the vehicle reaching apogee - approximately 10 km in altitude. SN10 performed a propellant transition to the internal header tanks, which hold landing propellant, before reorienting itself for reentry and a controlled aerodynamic descent.

The Starship prototype descended under active aerodynamic control, accomplished by independent movement of two forward and two aft flaps on the vehicle. All four flaps were actuated by an onboard flight computer to control Starship’s attitude during flight and enabled a precise landing at the intended location. SN10’s Raptor engines reignited as the vehicle performed the landing flip maneuver immediately before successfully touching down on the landing pad!
As if the flight test was not exciting enough, SN10 experienced a rapid unscheduled disassembly shortly after landing. These test flights are all about improving our understanding and development of a fully reusable transportation system designed to carry both crew and cargo on long-duration interplanetary flights, and help humanity return to the Moon, and travel to Mars and beyond.

Commenti
Elias Ohm
Elias Ohm 18 ore fa
So finally that attack is rebugged for enslavement of attackers pilots and defense missiles to aoid future outfalls...
LoparceGaming826
LoparceGaming826 18 ore fa
1:11 sn9 moment 1:31 sn8 moment
PrimeIX
PrimeIX 22 ore fa
gg
Виталий Лукашин
Виталий Лукашин Giorno fa
👍👽
emmm
emmm Giorno fa
It's so. incredibly. loud. WOw!
Heybar Sequera
Heybar Sequera Giorno fa
Amazing job!
stringsnare
stringsnare Giorno fa
Was that real footage or CGI interspersed with real footage?
alexn310
alexn310 Giorno fa
Real footage, all the way through. It was a livestream.
HOW DO YOU VENT LIKE BLUE?
HOW DO YOU VENT LIKE BLUE? 2 giorni fa
11:42 The best most unbelievable non CGI part of the video. Truly amazing shot
andre troll
andre troll 4 giorni fa
MUY BUENO- UN ABRAZO Y UN BESO GORDO- El video mio se encuentra en el YOU TUBE y se llama- robotizado con cd 4017 , ne 555 pilotos El plano esta bajo el video. Andre Troll Kaiser
Frank Tuckwell
Frank Tuckwell 4 giorni fa
Wow! I thankyou but i think the landing was far more astounding than the take off. Fantastic👍👍👍
Glitched Blox
Glitched Blox 4 giorni fa
11:41 Looks like one of those movie scenes.
bcvbb hyui
bcvbb hyui 4 giorni fa
Huge Respect for the Engineers, technicians and every worker at SpaceX 🙏💯.
moises gonzales
moises gonzales 4 giorni fa
Es una nave de Flash Gordon, OMG!
Caio Portella
Caio Portella 4 giorni fa
Cortaram a parte da explosão pq? HUAUHAUHHAUUH medo de cair ações elon musk?
onemaxlight
onemaxlight 4 giorni fa
amazing..
ICOD73
ICOD73 4 giorni fa
For a moment, it looked CGI.
Alex Hendrix
Alex Hendrix 3 giorni fa
I watched this with my own eyes. 100% not CGI.
bcvbb hyui
bcvbb hyui 4 giorni fa
Nice
Ailsa Ni
Ailsa Ni 5 giorni fa
The reduced vibration of this missile is an unparalleled precedent
Igor Delta F.
Igor Delta F. 5 giorni fa
Man will go mars no earlier than 2040. Even a small cybertruck takes years to be released to public, I can't imagine how long it will take starship to meet all the requirements. Probably decades. The news says we will see Man on mars very soon, just to keep us high expectations, but I think it's just marketing. I'm just being realistic.
Matt's Youtube stuff
Matt's Youtube stuff 14 ore fa
@Igor Delta F. I'm not sure where you get 1400 days from. During the closest approach, Mars is about a 6-9 month journey depending on which year you launch. That is maximum ~270 days trip one way to Mars. Perhaps you can be more specific on where you are getting your numbers from
Igor Delta F.
Igor Delta F. 15 ore fa
@Matt's ITpost stuff Yes they are unrelated. But my point was not to relate them, instead I used cybertruck merely to give an example. The degree of complexity of starship is just far beyond from what we have achieved in terms of technology right now. The longest time a human was continuously in space is 437 days, and the record is 665 cumulative days. A crewed mission would require 1410 days trip plus several days of orbital alignment, docking , collecting data, weather conditions IF everything goes 100% perfect. We are not talking about a single individual +1500 days but a CREW of maybe 4 to 8 people! Unfortunately there are several other factors that we need at least a decade to develop. Don't take me wrong, I want to see so hard humans going mars, but not as a suicidal mission. On my perspective no earlier than 2040 for a crewed mission. But for a cargo ship maybe in this decade. Fingers crossed 🙏
Matt's Youtube stuff
Matt's Youtube stuff 16 ore fa
You can't compare the two, at all. For a long time, there just wasn't a facility available to build Cybertruck. The major hurdle or requirement to go to Mars is having a safe and reliable system, and launching at the correct window which opens every two years. In 2022, SpaceX will (fingers crossed) be able to send unmanned cargo vehicles to Mars, which if successful will pave the way to send humans in either 2024 or 2026. If they are unsuccessful in 2022, it will push the timeline back another 2 years. The one thing I agree with you on is yes this is marketing. They want people to be excited about this and they want to make it their goal to send people to Mars regularly. TLDR; The point is the comparison you make to the Cybertruck is completely unrelated to the development of Starship.
69
69 4 giorni fa
@Igor Delta F. Where do you get your information about the cybertruck starting in 2012?
Igor Delta F.
Igor Delta F. 4 giorni fa
@69 the idea of a cybertruck started in 2012. The first prototype was in 2018. The first cybertruck to public will be in the end of 2021. Starship is so far to meet the requirements, without mentioning the human limitations in other fields to make this reality. 2040 is a optimistic year, and I hope I am wrong because I want to be alive when man go there.
little Phoenix33
little Phoenix33 5 giorni fa
So Elon is iron man because that seems a lot like how iron man lands 😄👀
vbddfy euuyt
vbddfy euuyt 5 giorni fa
happen live 😂
David X
David X 4 giorni fa
@Ailsa Ni what
Ailsa Ni
Ailsa Ni 5 giorni fa
Демократия не долетит до Марса.
Wayne Davis
Wayne Davis 6 giorni fa
did anyone else notice the hard bounce on landing or the drone view that looked like a cheap netflix movie?
Olavo Neves
Olavo Neves 6 giorni fa
hi mates is very enjoy...blazz_zzzz
SadSmileTV
SadSmileTV 6 giorni fa
congratulations
JP muro
JP muro 6 giorni fa
What a bunch a shit! Can't believe y'all into this crap, CGI at the end got me cracking, no craft can do that TODAY , c'mon guys wake the fuck up
alexn310
alexn310 Giorno fa
@JP muro I have shown you multiple videos captured by amateurs, yet you still insist on cgi? What's your proof of CGI?
alexn310
alexn310 Giorno fa
@JP muro twitter.com/RGVaerialphotos/status/1377001018102276097 (That was SN11 the twitter pic, the links are SN10) itpost.info/dev/r3CCq5-3ZKTHfoM/video itpost.info/dev/oW6fe5Cbjq2yg4c/video
alexn310
alexn310 Giorno fa
@JP muro Well sure since that was filmed before the launch, lemme find you an amateur video of it. Theres also RGV Aerial Photography, and after the bellyflop Fail of SN11 they photgraphed it's nosecone laying on the ground im gonna get you some links.
JP muro
JP muro Giorno fa
The real question lies beyond you and me and what we both think. Theres proof , that this is all a hoax. The question is why are you defending something that you can't prove, while all claims against what your trying to cling to have tons of facts , scientific, to back them up. My proof is right there , the cgi sequence at the end and the so called landing, i know its hard. We both have our own truths and i respect that, its just that's this is soo in our faces , its impossible not to see. And question its nature
JP muro
JP muro Giorno fa
We'll , yes , i see it. It never took off. Did it? i mean i could go there tomorrow and take a pic, what's your proof? Where's the footage of take off and descent.
JP muro
JP muro 6 giorni fa
Modern warfare CGI looks way better , should give em a call #elonmusk
David X
David X 4 giorni fa
Go to boca chica
vbddfy euuyt
vbddfy euuyt 5 giorni fa
looks like a sci fi film
Björn der Sachse
Björn der Sachse 6 giorni fa
Alles nur lüge
Volksgenosse Erich Honecker
Volksgenosse Erich Honecker 5 giorni fa
Jede Person mit einem Donald Trump Profilbild hat still zu sein
alexn310
alexn310 6 giorni fa
Go there yourself and see it for yourself
Andy Harrison
Andy Harrison 7 giorni fa
This style of aircraft- is it "Flash Gordon" style? Or more Rocketeer?
shark2v
shark2v 7 giorni fa
nice cgi
David X
David X 4 giorni fa
Go to boca chica
alexn310
alexn310 7 giorni fa
You can go there yourself and see it
John McGrath
John McGrath 7 giorni fa
Is this even real? It looks like cgi
Juan Pablo Muro
Juan Pablo Muro Giorno fa
yeah, its because it is
KELOO JBL ッ
KELOO JBL ッ 6 giorni fa
@alexn310 ye
alexn310
alexn310 7 giorni fa
Go to Boca Chica, TX. You can see these getting built and flown in real time there.
Lexi Talks
Lexi Talks 7 giorni fa
Nice
แก่ง นาง
แก่ง นาง 8 giorni fa
ไอ้ควายน็อตบอกแผนทุกอย่างองค์กรNASA มีแผนอยากเป็นเบอร์1ของสหรัฐ.แล้วจะกลับไปใช้สถานีอวกาศสกดจิตทุกพรรคในสหรัฐ. ให้สนับสนุนเงินงบประมาณและมีตัวแทนNASA ที่หวังลงชิงต่ำแหน่งประธานาธิบดีสหรัฐ.ในสมัยต่อไป
แก่ง นาง
แก่ง นาง 8 giorni fa
NASA กลายเป็นควายเมื่อถูกจับได้ว่าใ้ดาวเทียม และใช้สถานทีอวกาศทดลองมนุษย์ แต่สู้ความคิดมนุษย์ไม่ได้ โดยล่าสุดมีการเปิดเผย ชื่อบอร์ดผู้สั่งให้มนุษย์อวกาศบนสถานีอวกาศทำงานนี้
Dave Timothy
Dave Timothy 8 giorni fa
12:00 I see starhopper
KELOO JBL ッ
KELOO JBL ッ 6 giorni fa
ye love starhopper
Saanichton Ministries
Saanichton Ministries 8 giorni fa
What I don’t like about the BFR is that there is no redundancy. Since fuel tanks are located in the nose cone, the crew cannot jettison from the top to escape an inevitable failure. Any manned flights must have redundancy.
Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez
Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez 7 giorni fa
@Saanichton Ministries I agree ...,.. I don’t see nasa trusting SpaceX to place astronauts on Mars anytime soon until starship has at least 200-600 successful flights without incidence along with a smart AI to pilot starship However SpaceX does have falcon Heavy which is a proven space vehicle which I do see NASA trusting to send to the moon or Mars 🥲 Only the future will tell
Saanichton Ministries
Saanichton Ministries 7 giorni fa
@Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez fair enough. After a study of the STS program, it would be a nightmare to fly on a rocket. As a pilot myself, it is fascinating science. But way too risky. I don’t ever see the risk factor going away. Man it too flawed. Too much can go wrong in manned space flight. Too many extremes. I don’t know if it is ethical watching people kill themselves trying to go to Mars.... like the Mars one project?
Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez
Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez 7 giorni fa
@Saanichton Ministries Is this suppose be hyperbole ....? Obviously not, they only flow 4 of them🤦🏻and their still very much prototype rockets That’s the equivalence of me asking you if you’d like a flight on the wrights brothers first plane .....
Saanichton Ministries
Saanichton Ministries 7 giorni fa
@Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez would you if you could?
Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez
Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez 7 giorni fa
@Saanichton Ministries 🤨 ....... no I don’t
Денис Петин
Денис Петин 8 giorni fa
Демократия не долетит до Марса.
Pascal Fokx
Pascal Fokx 8 giorni fa
bravo let's Mars but if Mars gravity is lower than Earth it's going to be easy landing
KELOO JBL ッ
KELOO JBL ッ 6 giorni fa
ouais
NOMOLAS GYROTOURBILLON
NOMOLAS GYROTOURBILLON 8 giorni fa
FIREBALL XL5!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
vince mm
vince mm 8 giorni fa
looks like a sci fi film
KELOO JBL ッ
KELOO JBL ッ 6 giorni fa
ye but is real
Carmen A. Cabello
Carmen A. Cabello 9 giorni fa
That is bull shit.
It’s grant
It’s grant 6 giorni fa
@Shorty haha
Shorty
Shorty 6 giorni fa
Carmen is close to karen
It’s grant
It’s grant 8 giorni fa
@alexn310 thanks for saving me time
alexn310
alexn310 8 giorni fa
Go and watch it yourself in boca chica before throwing bullshit accusations on ITpost
Nebula Dust
Nebula Dust 9 giorni fa
24 7 live Mars cam coming soon : )
collilab laboratorio visivo
collilab laboratorio visivo 9 giorni fa
Congrats, the best sci fi movie ever... it's incredible...
Константин Голубятников
Константин Голубятников 9 giorni fa
Большая консервная банка с крыльями и двигателями..круто..поздравляю. Она еще и садиться..супер..
Jephro321
Jephro321 9 giorni fa
I like how they cut out where it exploded anyway. Scrub X blew it again. At least they are consistent.
Matt's Youtube stuff
Matt's Youtube stuff 16 ore fa
They didn't cut anything out. The livestream ended shortly after landing. The explosion happened approx 7/8 minutes later
K4!T3N
K4!T3N 4 giorni fa
Did you even seen the live stream?
69
69 4 giorni fa
This is the testing stage it's normal for things to blow up.
alexn310
alexn310 8 giorni fa
@Jephro321 Was saying no to you stating they cut it out. Yes it exploded, but they didnt "cut it out" they ended the stream before it exploded.
Jephro321
Jephro321 8 giorni fa
@alexn310 no what it blew up period.
gilbondfac
gilbondfac 10 giorni fa
launch pad is too close to the installations ! dangerous
KK FF
KK FF 10 giorni fa
When landing, the ignition is too late to correct. It needs to be 1-2 seconds earlier.The liquid fuel bunker should be divided into many small bunkers. Otherwise, if the whole bunker is turned vertically to horizontal, and then to vertical, the kinetic energy of the liquid itself can heat itself, causing expansion and deflagration
Epic gamer Heap1
Epic gamer Heap1 2 giorni fa
@TimePro oh nvm I commented on this before I check Elon’s Tweet again I kinda didn’t remember the case
TimePro
TimePro 2 giorni fa
@Epic gamer Heap1 Starship DOES use helium. After SN8s crash helium was put into the header tank of SN9 and SN10 to keep the tank pressurized and to prevent what happened to SN8. The helium was not supposed to be ingested.
Epic gamer Heap1
Epic gamer Heap1 3 giorni fa
@TimePro An Starship does not have helium it only uses lox, methane fuel and pressure.
TimePro
TimePro 5 giorni fa
@Epic gamer Heap1 That would be the case for SN8. SN10 has a hard landing because it ingested helium unexpectedly.
Epic gamer Heap1
Epic gamer Heap1 5 giorni fa
It is not late according to Elon the single raptor engine was low on thrust to due low pressure inside of one of the tanks
Dolores Izabella
Dolores Izabella 10 giorni fa
Вероятно, данная труба должна изображать носитель? Труба еле-еле взобралась на высоту 2 км и опустилась на землю. Как она собирается разогнать полезный груз до необходимой скорости? Это просто лапша для неграмотных.
Huỳnh Đức Lê
Huỳnh Đức Lê 10 giorni fa
Need to add a parachute placed on top of the missile, when it falls straight. Need to improve the landing cooling system with the missile fixation axle after landing, I mean upgrading the yard system so that under it there is a shaft that can move and attach itself. as a landing gear. Maybe so, try using a flying parachute that cuts off when the Rocket is falling in mid-air. hm ... i think this idea can be sold, maybe n't 😄
It’s grant
It’s grant 8 giorni fa
@Huỳnh Đức Lê Please for the love of god stop calling it a missile!
alexn310
alexn310 8 giorni fa
@Huỳnh Đức Lê Yes, but they've already demonstrated they can land it without, and a parachute would also increase turnaround time for reuse. No need for one if propulsive landing can already yield the requested results.
Huỳnh Đức Lê
Huỳnh Đức Lê 8 giorni fa
@alexn310 I know it's heavy, I mean the parachute is only used for a short time and then cut off when the missile is horizontal, except that the missile is placed at the top of the missile retained at the upright position. The parachute flew horizontally should be two moderate instead of one large enough to bear the load since it would be cut off to enter the final stage anyway. Although mainly used to reduce the force and help more stability, the possibility of wind, the weather will adversely affect the parachute and affect the missile but this problem can be improved. which is that you can use three parachutes to change your posture from horizontal to straight if you cut the parachute from the tail of the Rocket.
alexn310
alexn310 8 giorni fa
Starship is too heavy for a parachute.
nice guy
nice guy 10 giorni fa
what do you make of this: Take a look at the spaceX logo. (the actual logo). When I look at the logo SpaceX... I'm seeing: Spy.... then it says..... Cc .....(which in numerology is 33. Freemasons number). .... Then what looks like a symbol that appear to be something trying to 'break out of the dome". So that's one interpretation. Or another: Spa cex. Or in other words "Spa Sex". then the X in that looks like it could represent the act of sex (look carefully, it's crazy.) (boom-chic-a-waa-waa). Okay and a 3rd interpretation goes like this: SpaceX. Well "X" in english and internationally is a way of saying "No". So it's Space-NO. or in reverse: No Space. Which is pretty obvious these days. So those are 3 interpretations of the SpaceX LOGO.
It’s grant
It’s grant 3 giorni fa
@nice guy I have no patience for people with special needs
nice guy
nice guy 3 giorni fa
@69 no joke. All major corporate logos have something encoded.
nice guy
nice guy 3 giorni fa
@It’s grant no joke. All major corporate logos have something encoded.
nice guy
nice guy 3 giorni fa
@K4!T3N The rockets are a scam. The cars are turning out to be a scam. Everyone who's used PayPal for any length of time knows it's a complete scam. What has he turned out yet that's actually a quality product that's not a lie or a scam??? The car is one thing, because it's just a really really shitty car. But the rockets are total frauds. It's not space exploration. It's a fireworks company. People are so dumb they don't understand anything.
K4!T3N
K4!T3N 4 giorni fa
You milking it??.... bruuuuuuhhhh
Biljana Milinčić-Bežanović
Biljana Milinčić-Bežanović 10 giorni fa
I think that the engineers made a mistake in constructing the "SN" rocket in that they practically limited the cooling of the "Raptor" engine. When the descent starts and the engines start, they start or do not work. Then air pressure is created which returns the heat to the "pot", so to speak. With Falcon rockets, the engines are free and they don't have that problem. One of the solutions is to drill holes in the lower part, next to the legs, or to line the engines with refractory material.
hordes Coffee
hordes Coffee 10 giorni fa
Did anybody see the paper clip to the right of screen
It’s grant
It’s grant 8 giorni fa
?????????? please show when?????????? U OK DUDE????????????
Die Katze
Die Katze 10 giorni fa
Well done folks . Keep it up .
derms ter
derms ter 11 giorni fa
cgi did not improve much i guess..
derms ter
derms ter 4 giorni fa
@K4!T3N you speak like you came from there lol
K4!T3N
K4!T3N 4 giorni fa
@derms ter Go to boca chica, texas.... you're just lazy... lol
Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez
Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez 7 giorni fa
@derms ter Theirs no need...... theirs hundreds of videos of the landing .......
derms ter
derms ter 7 giorni fa
@Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez you film the landing for me, i will believe
Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez
Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez 7 giorni fa
@derms ter Go to boca chica in the next 2-3 weeks for SN15..........Lets see if its CGI at that point :)
bouytt guyt
bouytt guyt 11 giorni fa
team.
FinZdrav
FinZdrav 11 giorni fa
Оооо ес 🤑
nothing is impossible
nothing is impossible 11 giorni fa
Cool
Aistis Aukstikalnis
Aistis Aukstikalnis 10 giorni fa
itpost.info/dev/jo-siIyZrKe0qHs/video
Ca Sneaks
Ca Sneaks 11 giorni fa
The mature pan practically observe because custard adventitiously refuse apud a unadvised captain. handy, dull black
Jared Johanne Agustin
Jared Johanne Agustin 11 giorni fa
Eh 3 years left before the starship goes to Mars
bouytt guyt
bouytt guyt 11 giorni fa
Comento : viendo lo bien me llama la atención la toma de este lanzamiento que alguien por favor me explique como se realizo esta toma que tipo de cámara se uso no se s
Ron Guada
Ron Guada 11 giorni fa
That.... was incredible!
NOOBSTORE
NOOBSTORE 11 giorni fa
soooooo perfect
dLedger XYZ
dLedger XYZ 11 giorni fa
Release the onboard camera during descent so that we can see space at that altitude. Oh nevermind, it's still the decades long grammar why not
Brent Smith
Brent Smith 5 giorni fa
This flight went to 10km. If you want to 'see space at that altitude', whatever that means, you'd be better served by booking a flight on an airliner, as they can get up to 13km.
Boris Wrongston
Boris Wrongston 11 giorni fa
more tax payers money down the Shitter
Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez
Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez 7 giorni fa
Your probably more dependent on the government tax payers than SpaceX is.........Their a private space company :)
Ethan Roberts
Ethan Roberts 11 giorni fa
It's a private company, no tax payers money
ceerw buty
ceerw buty 11 giorni fa
The reduced vibration of this missile is an unparalleled precedent
Charalampos Avgenikos
Charalampos Avgenikos 12 giorni fa
You are coming from the SN11 flight test yesterday. 😂
ForgeSkyGaming
ForgeSkyGaming 11 giorni fa
Yes 😭😭
Максим Поскин
Максим Поскин 12 giorni fa
Это что то фантастическое
Peter Zhu
Peter Zhu 12 giorni fa
The typical profit quantitatively scold because height formally mix notwithstanding a steadfast room. squeamish, incandescent net
Daniel Perez
Daniel Perez 12 giorni fa
the geniuses just keep showing off.. very impressive
ceerw buty
ceerw buty 11 giorni fa
Give it a few more minutes
HYTECH REALATORS
HYTECH REALATORS 12 giorni fa
Congratulations 🎉👍
one click
one click 12 giorni fa
The brash destruction joly add because tuna tellingly complain notwithstanding a helpful smile. quizzical, bright nation
Mayo Garland
Mayo Garland 12 giorni fa
The dramatic club relevantly kiss because otter broadly scorch per a selfish aluminium. square, impolite temple
Manuel Martin
Manuel Martin 12 giorni fa
pero tambien da la impresión que fue un lanzamiento controlado preparando algo a si como para un futuro aterrizaje esa son mis tres impresiones no se elucubro
Manuel Martin
Manuel Martin 12 giorni fa
Comento : viendo lo bien me llama la atención la toma de este lanzamiento que alguien por favor me explique como se realizo esta toma que tipo de cámara se uso no se si existe tecnología para enfocar a tan larga distancia esta toma me hace recordar un programa de Tv de cuando era niño .( Thunderbirds Los Guardianes del Espacio ) que por cierto todo lo que allí emitían hoy día es una realidad ........................suspicacia
Андрій Володимирович
Андрій Володимирович 12 giorni fa
Рогозин обосрался...
Jay Paint
Jay Paint 12 giorni fa
Who’s here after SN11 blew up mid-flip maneuver
KidSpaceFans
KidSpaceFans 3 giorni fa
@Jay Paint That's better!
Jay Paint
Jay Paint 3 giorni fa
@KidSpaceFans Yeah that sounds a bit pessimistic. Let me fix that.
Pol Valls
Pol Valls 11 giorni fa
mid-landing flip you mean
KidSpaceFans
KidSpaceFans 11 giorni fa
It didn't blow up mid-flight...
ᛏᚤᚱᚠᛁᚾᚷᚱ
ᛏᚤᚱᚠᛁᚾᚷᚱ 12 giorni fa
Elon: NUCLEAR MISSILE COMIN' YOUR WAY!... Just kidding...
Pol Valls
Pol Valls 11 giorni fa
a missile coming belly first?
Ian Morton
Ian Morton 12 giorni fa
...SpaceXtastic...!!!
asterisKs
asterisKs 12 giorni fa
Shouldn't have launched sn11 in the fog, it was gonna blow up anyway even if the FTS didn't work. Welp sn15 here we come
TimePro
TimePro 7 giorni fa
Wether there was fog or not it doesn’t change anything.
Darth Revan
Darth Revan 9 giorni fa
That's what I said! And everyone went mental at me for calling SpaceX foolish as fuck for doing so. Completely rushed and wasted.
Don
Don 12 giorni fa
great achievement, the landing is awesome, but somehow i don't like those type of spaceships. I believe one day we will go into one piece of fully controlled spaceship :)
Don
Don 13 ore fa
@Matt's ITpost stuff rather 500-1000y ;)
Matt's Youtube stuff
Matt's Youtube stuff 14 ore fa
@Don Yes it's very interesting indeed. Perhaps we will see such technological advancements 50-100 years from now.
Don
Don 15 ore fa
@Matt's ITpost stuff to travel to new stars also requires very high medical knowledge, Hybernation. if it will turn out no teleporation is possible (again quantum entanglement story) That quantum ental..... is imo one of the most important thing in whole science. Why it exists, what is that for? to carry mental state from dead body ? living after death in different dimention? We can't see any real connection of paired subparticules on distance, but maybe this is the effect of some processes from highe dimension. As scientist can't detect any even smallest fluctuation of anything during the process ,when changing state of 1st particular automatically change state of the other in time of ZERO at whatever distance. If I remember the latest test was performed at the distance of around 60kms or more. Although near death experience (NDE) happens only in our heads.... we cannot just say for 100% that it's due to processes in brain (very likely) but if we hear that those people could be in all places they want at the same time, that they even could tell what their family members (away) were doing while they were "out" of their bodies as they claim. Of course assuming that at least a few stories were real not just faked for any reason...as people can do a lot for money. ....selling stories etc. The most interesting is the case of neurosurgeon (not religiious one). What the nature uses that feature for. This is the most interesting thing for me in whole science...
Matt's Youtube stuff
Matt's Youtube stuff 15 ore fa
@Don You are right, of course, we don't know the technological advancements that will occur well into the future. The sort of technology that helps engineer an SSTO vehicle will likely be used to travel to new stars.
Don
Don 16 ore fa
@Matt's ITpost stuff nowadays impossible. Imagine getting energy from splitting atom ( a lot in atmosphere) on fly and later in space getting it from photons or other stuff, included magainzed energy from new kind of battery. Too early to even imagine how it may be in next 1000years. I bet the aim is not to carry too much fuel with the ship and that might be possible as you can get energy from anything.. what matters is to create proper devices which can do that. Also imagine that something might be hidden.. explain how works quantum entalngement... maybe we will be able to send small portions of energy if a source is millions kms away. If we can affect a state of an sub-atom particular on distance, that means a change. a change means that something happens if something happens you can get energy from that...as there is no action without energy. to change something = energy rises... so why not to connect millions of the particles to set entanglement on on those packets and do something with that on distance ;) In space you only needs energy to change velocity and direction of you vehicle... landing or starting from planets different storry as you have a lot of particules in atmospheres you can use to get that energy
Syahrul Ridzuan
Syahrul Ridzuan 12 giorni fa
Yep, I knew it
Neil Mcmac
Neil Mcmac 12 giorni fa
High altitude ? ??? It's a rocket , ten kilometers ( six miles ) is not high . Germany was sending rockets that high in 1944 . 76 years and no progress ??? . And this is an empty rocket , load her up with fuel and life support systems and this tin can will never leave the launch pad . MARS has nothing to fear
69
69 4 giorni fa
@Neil Mcmac so you're stuck in the past considering you said you lived through the 60s and 70s. You're hated for Elon Musk also seems to be getting in the way of your good judgment if you ever had any. Starship and Saturn v are not comparable. We did not have real reusable rockets in the 40s quit making up shit.
Neil Mcmac
Neil Mcmac 6 giorni fa
@Pol Valls dollars to doughnuts says Musk picks up and leaves town before any of his make believe rockets ever reach orbit . He is just suckling as many dollars out of the system that he can , or are you one of those morons that really believe Musk is using his own money . Lay off the drugs and try to think ahead a little , you load that tin can up with supplies, life support, crew quarters and extra engines and fuel to orbit and de-orbit and you have a disaster waiting to happen . Nothing but a pipe dream .
Pol Valls
Pol Valls 6 giorni fa
@Neil Mcmac falcon 9 landed at its 5th try and now it's the most reliable rocket. Starship had 4, and next prototype is full of new technologies successfully proven. Please, don't compare a mission to a test. The expectations are different, Saturn V was pioneering, Starship is so too. And Sn10 landed. SN11 tested advanced solutions, they learn from them and they will do the same, fly fail fix
IsaQuest
IsaQuest 7 giorni fa
@Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez yeah it wasnt a good paragraph but you get the point that im trying to make. again, you said it very well
Neil Mcmac
Neil Mcmac 7 giorni fa
@IsaQuest because you don't learn anything if the damn thing is not balanced as it would be , or loaded as it would be . Musk is going ass backwards . Proving something that doesn't help him one little bit in the real world . Put weights in to make up for crew, fuel, live support . Now test it , Musk is testing on an empty can , the balance point will not be close to what a real ships balance would be ,,,,, so at the end of the day Musk has learned zero .
haug0099
haug0099 12 giorni fa
Give it a few more minutes
ToXiC_BigFatBaby
ToXiC_BigFatBaby 12 giorni fa
whos here after sn11
Latortuga 007
Latortuga 007 12 giorni fa
🚀My rating: Starship SN8: 8/10 Starship SN9: 4/10 Starship SN10: 9/10 Starship SN11: 2/10 Gonna update my rating every time from now on.
Matt's Youtube stuff
Matt's Youtube stuff 16 ore fa
What is your rating based on? Level of excitement or what was achieved? I'm just curious as to how you gave SN11 a 2/10, you couldn't see a damn thing! lol I would argue that SN11 is an unfortunate 0/10 because of the fog, but from an engineering perspective a 10/10 because it helped them identify an issue that they need to fix for future missions.
Pol Valls
Pol Valls 11 giorni fa
@IsaQuest no.
Latortuga 007
Latortuga 007 11 giorni fa
@TimePro the leaning was cool too
TimePro
TimePro 11 giorni fa
SN9 I'd say would be also 9/10. They fixed the header tank issue that was present in SN8s flight.
Latortuga 007
Latortuga 007 12 giorni fa
@Starship SN10 ur welcome! ☺️
Armchair Revolutionary
Armchair Revolutionary 12 giorni fa
Nutso!!lol...beautiful but nuts!!!congratulations to the whole team!!
Efloor
Efloor 12 giorni fa
I remember when these looked like grain silos
Gerald Wagner
Gerald Wagner 12 giorni fa
The trite market significantly harass because ship lilly glow without a empty history. wrong, depressed maraca
Afri Cola
Afri Cola 12 giorni fa
didnt it explode a couple minutes after?
Pol Valls
Pol Valls 11 giorni fa
this is the test flight video, this is not the video of the entire recovery process
Roland B.
Roland B. 12 giorni fa
it exploded 8 minutes later. but that's the fault of the landing legs,
tomer K
tomer K 12 giorni fa
Who is here after SN11?
Pol Valls
Pol Valls 11 giorni fa
me
27ratri kongsanti
27ratri kongsanti 12 giorni fa
Me
Jan Scampi
Jan Scampi 12 giorni fa
me
KaterinaTalantliva
KaterinaTalantliva 12 giorni fa
The quality is amazing
CYBERCEL
CYBERCEL 12 giorni fa
'these datas'
Halumash
Halumash 13 giorni fa
COMPLETELY CGI !! Maybe they want to remember others to the old SS20 ....
69
69 3 giorni fa
@K4!T3N what?
K4!T3N
K4!T3N 4 giorni fa
@69 Go to boca chica texas.... You're just lazy
69
69 4 giorni fa
@Halumash that argument doesn't even make sense.
Halumash
Halumash 4 giorni fa
@69 And propably they where the same reasons since that time in 69 , Mister 69 ...
Halumash
Halumash 4 giorni fa
@69 I already changed my mindset, my dear. Good night!!
Emerson Galatti
Emerson Galatti 13 giorni fa
kkkkkkkk a partir dos 10 min. computação gráfica, só se for muuuuito idiota pra acreditar
IsaQuest
IsaQuest 12 giorni fa
its not cgi. just look at the other people’s footage
Emerson Galatti
Emerson Galatti 13 giorni fa
esse cinegrafista é bom heim, caiu junto com o foguete, manteve-o nivelado no centro da imagem e só pra mostrar que é bom mesmo deu zoom out aos 11:35, aos 11:41 se vc não riu eu não vou te explicar...aos 12:05 a quicada na nave é a melhor...enfim...é por isso que os maus não disfarçam mais, não é necessário...
Rui Sarmento
Rui Sarmento 13 giorni fa
E mesmo que subas tão alto como uma águia e entre as estrelas plantes o teu ninho Eu te derrubarei.
Dhruva Shah
Dhruva Shah 13 giorni fa
Even if it blew up, my confidence in SpaceX has never been higher, and it will keep going up.
hordes Coffee
hordes Coffee 13 giorni fa
Or even space travel
hordes Coffee
hordes Coffee 13 giorni fa
Could it be possible to building an atom smasher in space. And place it vertically? Because, Im assuming that it must be laid down on earth, it could draw objects to it. If some way we could manipulate a simulated gravitational pull. We could then harness it as anti gravity. If its on or around an object. Could that work, is this possible. Or build it separately build some large mass to simulate a gravitational pull like earth's. Just asking a question
alexanderx33
alexanderx33 13 giorni fa
Starship on the pad after landing is something straight out of a movie. I mean that's a two lane highway right next to it! Its too big to be real
Your Mom
Your Mom 13 giorni fa
but they didn't show it blowing up which it did 6 mins later after landing
69
69 4 giorni fa
They stopped the recording before it blew up.
VirtualEchobolt
VirtualEchobolt 13 giorni fa
These times remind me of the 60s and mans desire to go beyond what we never thought would never be possible. Really amazing ship and really amazing guy Elon Musk.
Ash Williams
Ash Williams 13 giorni fa
Nice animation!
David X
David X 4 giorni fa
Go to boca chica
MOLE
MOLE 12 giorni fa
It’s real
Bloody Evolution
Bloody Evolution 13 giorni fa
Ooo which part?
Severin
Severin 13 giorni fa
It is definitely no coincidence, that the bellyflop starts at T+4:20
Starship | SN8 | High-Altitude Flight Test
1:59:32
Sorriso Grande
3:27
Alessandra Amoroso - Topic
visualizzazioni 117K
Guè Pequeno, DJ Harsh - Lifestyle (Official Video)
2:24
GuePequenoVEVO
visualizzazioni 447K
Sacky - Quello Vero Freestyle (Prod. NKO)
1:33
Sacky Official
visualizzazioni 373K
Free Mc's - Instagram (Official Video 4K)
2:53
Free Mc's
visualizzazioni 91K
Making Humans a Multiplanetary Species
1:04:46
SpaceX
visualizzazioni 2,7M
Starship SN10 [4k, Clean Audio & Slow Mo Supercut]
19:18
Everyday Astronaut
visualizzazioni 581K
Starship SN10 Cryogenic Proof Test
3:45:37
NASASpaceflight
visualizzazioni 408K
What's Inside The SpaceX Starship?
08:28
Tech Vision
visualizzazioni 830K
The Secret of Synchronization
20:58
Veritasium
visualizzazioni 6M
Sorriso Grande
3:27
Alessandra Amoroso - Topic
visualizzazioni 117K
Guè Pequeno, DJ Harsh - Lifestyle (Official Video)
2:24
GuePequenoVEVO
visualizzazioni 447K
Sacky - Quello Vero Freestyle (Prod. NKO)
1:33
Sacky Official
visualizzazioni 373K
Free Mc's - Instagram (Official Video 4K)
2:53
Free Mc's
visualizzazioni 91K
LA MIA NUOVA ASTRONAVE
12:20
Alberto Naska
visualizzazioni 210K
TOUR DEL MIO NUOVO STUDIO (Costruito da solo)!
14:01
Valeria Vedovatti
0:20
Ele Shares
visualizzazioni 281K